Comments on: The World Without Us

By: Brian Walker

Brian Walker — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:14:02 +0000

Joe, Do you want to swap links? I also have a fledgling website http://www.walkercommercialfunding.org …but it is a work in progress..
here's my blog: http://greenfunding-walkercommercialfunding.blogs...
additionally, I may be able to help you land a job

By: ecojoe

ecojoe — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:47:26 +0000

While 'tis true that some endangered species are kept around thanks to people, most are endangered due to habitat loss or other man-made activity. So yeah, some would be gone, but a lot would recover.

I do agree that some GM crops would survive in the wild. They're made to be strong and hard to kill. But I gots to disagree about buildings and bridges falling apart; buildings that are really old and still around are still standing thanks to maintenance and repairs by people. Without that, they'd fall into disrepair.

By: bob

bob — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:55:45 +0000

Nice apart from its a load of crock,most endangered species around now are kept endangered and not extinct by man interfering,take away man and they would be extinct in a couple of years.For methane to disappear cows would have to disappear as they are the main producer.GM crops would transfer from sectioned off areas to the wild not disappear. there are hundreds of bridges more than 100 years old and hundreds of buildings more than 1000 years old most of those that have gone have been demolished by man.There are thousands of timber buildings more than 100 years old surviving.

By: ecojoe

ecojoe — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:53:20 +0000

Jim, how ’bout you start it off with yourself.

Just kidding?

By: Jim

Jim — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:42:36 +0000

I hope this happens sooner than later.